Robert Wilken: not impressed with pluralism.
Commentators on religion are always harping about how our contemporary “radically pluralist” situation is unprecedented, and more likely than not, catastrophic for the Christian tradition.
Self-styled radical theologians such as John Hick in God Has Many Names, Charles E. Winquist in Desiring Theology, plus John Shelby Spong and Raimondo Panikkar in academically less respectable volumes (whose names I shall not mention), argue that Christian theology must change or die in the face of this revolutionary situation.
Robert Louis Wilken, one of our most important scholars of early Christianity, believes nothing could be further from the truth. In the volume Remembering the Christian Past (Eerdmans, 1995) he proves that we’re only replaying the debates of early (and medieval) Christians:
“Christians, however, have long had to face the challenge of other religions. For the first four hundred years of Christian history a traditional religious culture (which was not, as once thought, moribund) set the agenda for many Christian intellectuals, and its spokesmen energetically contested what seemed to be the [exclusivist] pretensions of the new religion.”
As much as I hate grading undergraduate essays that begin with “ever since the dawn of the universe / man / culture / religion / Christianity” or with “those who cannot remember the past . . .” the case of religious pluralism is an instance where one of those phrases apply.
Take a look at the arguments of Porphyry, Celsus, Cicero, and they all pretty much sound like Symmachus when he argues against the Christians:
“We gaze at the same stars, the sky belongs to all, the same universe surrounds us. What difference does it make by whose wisdom someone seeks the truth? We cannot attain to so great a mystery by one road.”
They also sound like today’s “radical theologians.” Closer acquaintance with history should turn our notions who the conservatives and liberals are in the religious pluralism debates upside-down. It makes all the difference.
As luck would have it, the book is available at a massive 60% discount from amazon.com.
Cosmos the in Lost 
Pingback: Constantine, Socrates, and Other Saints | Cosmos the in Lost
Pingback: One More Nortre Dame Book on/and the Legacy of Solidarność | Cosmos the in Lost
Reblogged this on Cosmos the in Lost and commented:
Myth-busting 101 with Robert Louis Wilken.
Pluralism is a fact. The real issue is the relevance of religious faith in relation to public order (law and politics). I have not read Wilken’s book but since “love” is inconsistent with coercion there needs to be “space” for acceptance or refusal of religious propositions (certainly from the Christian understanding of the primacy of agape). Living together with disagreement is what we need principles for not hankering back to supposed times when we didn’t have to deal with “messy others”.
Did you read the post? Late antiquity was the prime-time for messy others.
But that would mean you would have to read what the “other” wrote, and aren’t we all too busy telling the other about how they should listen to the other?
Don’t forget we’re also the other from the point of view of the other. What’s more, the other is also continually telling you, the other’s other, how to listen to the other.
Pingback: A Fish Rots from the Head Down (On Paul Elie and Secularization in the Arts) | Cosmos the in Lost